🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it feels like it’s time for a rethink. Throughout its history, an observance that began as a celebration and reminder of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has adopted a commercial tone, expanding to include functions where Black people are remunerated to talk to predominantly white listeners about hidden biases and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what increasing understanding is for.

The Background of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of commemoration and observance in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was publicly established in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in October in the Britain, Germany, Éire and the Holland.

The period has transformed since that time, focusing less on the accounts of the slave trade across the Atlantic and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on notable African descendants in politics, culture, and activism, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the method the month is commemorated is a reflection of the contemporary political context. How it develops is a instructive case in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to confront systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Troubling Time

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month more than the current time in which it falls this year. In the UK, a revitalized conservative movement in the form of the Reform political group is top in opinion ratings. In the summer we witnessed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the history of Britain. Kemi Badenoch, the person of color at the helm of the Conservative party, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a legislator feels emboldened to say that “not seeing any white faces” in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are expanding in the European continent as a entirety.

In the America, a significant offensive against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been brought, often successfully, to the top legal institutions of the country. A effort to remove African American heritage and narrative from the records is under way. One of the former president's early administrative commands focused on the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, alleging that they of a “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history” by depicting the United States “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the month symbolises how insufficiently it can be influential if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content celebrations of contributions in the past, rather than challenging the situation of the present. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is detached from the more extensive continuous action that is required. Denise Miller, a prof at a learning establishment, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the temporary “tokenism” of the celebration. “The problem with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it often means that Black History Month becomes a fleeting performance rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand actions for racial equality and recognition in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a urge to just discontinue observances such as Black History Month entirely, thinking they are no longer suitable, or are relics of an time that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and tradition of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and indeed, including corporate presentations – constitute an infrastructure that a considerable labor has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the situation evolves (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month seem? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is dispersed throughout the annual calendar (as various establishments are already commencing), parts of its content (particularly around historic Black characters) included in school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not shy away from political issues, and leaves space for individuals, particularly the younger generation, to air their fears and experiences. What use is mere awareness of the history when it fails to address the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the urban areas? Institutions who celebrate it should not be pacified with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and awareness of subtle slights, but faced with the risks that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not taken seriously. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, pressing, and reactive. Perhaps an complete renaming is required – Contemporary Black History Month.